05-02-2017, 05:35 PM
Torsten: so what you are saying is that even though Voynichese is autocopied from itself, the "itself" from which it is autocopied (i.e. that seeds the copy) contains near-universal adjacency rules which are then preserved in the autocopying?
And that these near-universal adjacency rules that are in the 'seeding' part of the text (and then preserved in the autocopied part of the text) may or may not be language but you're not interested?
And that all the word variations arise not from a conscious attempt to produce randomness, but instead from the autocopyist assembling many small blocks that retain those near-universal adjacency rules?
So... why is it that eol is 25x more frequent than ole, again?
And that these near-universal adjacency rules that are in the 'seeding' part of the text (and then preserved in the autocopied part of the text) may or may not be language but you're not interested?
And that all the word variations arise not from a conscious attempt to produce randomness, but instead from the autocopyist assembling many small blocks that retain those near-universal adjacency rules?
So... why is it that eol is 25x more frequent than ole, again?

