05-02-2017, 03:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-02-2017, 03:44 PM by Emma May Smith.)
Thanks Nick, but don't hold your breath that Torsten will reply constructively.
I pointed out the problem of word structure to to him in 2014 after his first paper. Over two years later he still hasn't adequately responded to it, saying that the writer was free to write as he pleased within his 'concept of language'. I don't think he has an answer because it would spoil his theory.
It's sad, but he's another Rugg with a neat answer which is all wrong.
I pointed out the problem of word structure to to him in 2014 after his first paper. Over two years later he still hasn't adequately responded to it, saying that the writer was free to write as he pleased within his 'concept of language'. I don't think he has an answer because it would spoil his theory.
It's sad, but he's another Rugg with a neat answer which is all wrong.

