05-02-2017, 01:36 AM
(05-02-2017, 12:18 AM)Torsten wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Quote:All you can possible say, at the very most, is that the Voynich manuscript is not written in Arabic, English, Latin, or German.
I used text from different text classes like a poem and verses. If you know a text class which is more repetitive then a religious text then indeed you can proof me wrong.
Why can't you even acknowledge that there's a problem? Why can't you even admit that you need to test more languages? Why can't you understand that you have to show there is a language-like pattern for co-occurrence before you can assert that the Voynich text doesn't fit it?
Torsten, you've made some great and interesting observations, but your theory is a leap into speculation and not remotely based on a firm argument.

