04-02-2017, 06:47 PM
(03-02-2017, 09:52 PM)Torsten wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.For me the text generation method was coming obvious while looking on rare words. See for instance the word "lkl". This word exists only 9 times for the VMS. But this doesn't mean that this word is equally distributed. In fact there is one page with three instances of "lkl". This page is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and since three instances of "lkl" can be found on this page it was three times available as source for generating other words. This is the reason that on page You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. also the words "lklor", "kl" and "lkol" exists. Beside "lkl" only 6 other words contain the sequence "lkl". One of this six words is the word "lklor" on page f105v. This is not a coincidence! See "lkl" / "talkl" on page You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and "lklcheol" / "lkl" on page f115v.
This seems to be a normal property of meaningful texts. Here's a post by Jorge Stolfi where he looks for patterns like this in War of the Worlds:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Quote:Along the same vein, these words occur exactly twice, at most 20
tokens apart:
VMS:
FIRST LAST SPAN WORD
----- ----- ----- ---------
644 650 6 damo
6713 6731 18 olchdaiin
16965 16969 4 cheteey
27756 27757 1 qoekol
36106 36116 10 otaraiin
36462 36465 3 chtl
WotW:
FIRST LAST SPAN WORD
----- ----- ----- ---------
789 791 2 generation
5156 5159 3 a~screwin'
6428 6430 2 joint
6531 6538 7 ugly
6532 6539 7 brutes
6914 6915 1 flutter
8207 8214 7 novelty
11097 11104 7 fringe
15267 15268 1 aloo
17366 17370 4 shield
18391 18403 12 streamed
18414 18422 8 pillars
23663 23665 2 rows
29884 29897 13 uppermost
31994 31997 3 losing
33642 33655 13 deepened
34090 34094 4 girls
35385 35399 14 ellen
35568 35571 3 garrick
36993 36997 4 stampede
37729 37738 9 midland
Note that these include the successive repeats "qoekol qoekol",
"flutter flutter" and "aloo aloo".
As before, the scrambled files had no hits --- i.e. all words with two
occurrences were spread wider than 20 tokens.
In conclusion, both books contain many words that are confined
to specific sections, far more than expected by chance.
Of course this does not prove anything, but is yet another
constraint on proposed theories.
Surprisingly, the WotW has more "lumpy" words than the VMS. This may
be due to the fact that different sections are partly mixed in the
VMS. I need to find a metric of "lumpiness" that degrades more
graciously with such block-scrambling.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)