03-02-2017, 04:03 PM
I agree with David: it would be interesting to see how this compares to real texts, especially some in languages which are said to be close to Voynichese in relevant aspects, and/or in text types where the author repeats certain sets of words often.
It's also not completely clear to me how the only conclusion can be that the text is artificially generated. I understand why straightforward interpretation as a normal text in natural language is problematic, but I'm not certain why it should point towards artifical construction.
It's also not completely clear to me how the only conclusion can be that the text is artificially generated. I understand why straightforward interpretation as a normal text in natural language is problematic, but I'm not certain why it should point towards artifical construction.

