(03-02-2017, 08:04 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Another conclusion I think I see in these graphs (especially the top one for the entire
MS) is that the selection of the different groups is fairly arbitrary. There is one big cloud,
and there is no real boundary between the different groups. They are completely contiguous
everywhere.
In fact, in the Currier B plot there is a hint of some clustering, but inside the purple/magenta cloud...
Hello Rene,
Torsten has defined the colors in the following way:
To highlight words similar to "daiin", "ol" and "chedy" graph coloring is used. All nodes for a word that contains the glyph "i" are orange. Nodes for a word ending in "d" or "y" are purple. Nodes for words containing "ol", "or", "ar", "al" or end with "am" or "os" are green. All other nodes are colored using blue.
I think that the images do present some hints of clustering, but the clusters tend to appear as vertical regions in the diagrams, while Torsten's colors tend to be distributed horizontally.
The orange 'i' region seems to be somehow separated from the others.
The region I numbered 3 seems to correspond to sh- and ch- words.
Many thanks to Torsten for sharing these very interesting graphs!


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)