In the text what I define as "label text" the letter q occurs ca. 288 times.
The pattern of the text in the labels follows the exact same rules as the text, although there are minor differences such as frequencies shift.
But those are normal because the label text is 1469 and contains much less words. (text is 3905 lines)
The discussion should not be here on numbers. Because we probably all have the same numbers and understanding of the text thus far.
What is interesting about Torsten's theory is that he saw patterns. If I understood it well, you wrote a large set of rules and that can mimic the VMS text, correct?
A ruleset is very interesting as a solution if it is simple and can be applied easily.
Such a ruleset could be as rigid as a formula (possibly not here) but can also be intuitive.
For example: start writing: based on the first word you come up with, you are forced by the rules to write down a word from a pool that consists of x words.
Mixed with specific lettering rules such as, if you write an ch you can make it sh, if ... etc.
What the meaning of such a ruleset is, is not interesting at this point.
Any language has such ruleset, because it has been agreed upon by the people that use that language.
If we can focus on that set of rules, and really define it, the meaning will (hopefully) follow after that,
because we can see which other language has a similar ruleset and decipher and translate the VMS text.
The pattern of the text in the labels follows the exact same rules as the text, although there are minor differences such as frequencies shift.
But those are normal because the label text is 1469 and contains much less words. (text is 3905 lines)
The discussion should not be here on numbers. Because we probably all have the same numbers and understanding of the text thus far.
What is interesting about Torsten's theory is that he saw patterns. If I understood it well, you wrote a large set of rules and that can mimic the VMS text, correct?
A ruleset is very interesting as a solution if it is simple and can be applied easily.
Such a ruleset could be as rigid as a formula (possibly not here) but can also be intuitive.
For example: start writing: based on the first word you come up with, you are forced by the rules to write down a word from a pool that consists of x words.
Mixed with specific lettering rules such as, if you write an ch you can make it sh, if ... etc.
What the meaning of such a ruleset is, is not interesting at this point.
Any language has such ruleset, because it has been agreed upon by the people that use that language.
If we can focus on that set of rules, and really define it, the meaning will (hopefully) follow after that,
because we can see which other language has a similar ruleset and decipher and translate the VMS text.