Posts: 2,247Threads: 177
Member details
Posts: 2,247
Threads: 177
Thanks Received: 397 in 324 posts
Thanks Given: 894
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
0
Country:
I still find this one fairly amusing. This is practically like the perfect, invisible cloud-bunny. Here is a cloud-bunny that can't be seen at all. There's nothing to be seen, only the somewhat obscured indications that something here might be hexagonal in shape. It might be a throne or whatever. It almost seems ridiculous. How can something be identified, if it can't be seen?
It's like fitting piece into a jigsaw puzzle - a piece with knobs on all four sides. First, the Well of Moses is hexagonal. Second, it is VMs C-14 contemporary as of 1405. Third, it has a Burgundian connection to the Golden Fleece. Fourth, it connects to Dijon and with La Sainte Hostie de Dijon.
The piece fits. It fits without any reference to its visual presentation. It fits because of its 'nature' and its 'structure' not because of its appearance. And as such it is yet another, albeit rather subtle, addition to the growing set of disguised religious indications in the VMs illustrations.
Posts: 10,542Threads: 432
Member details
Posts: 10,542
Threads: 432
Thanks Received: 4,938 in 2,813 posts
Thanks Given: 4878
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
11
Country:
You don't know about the cloud-bunny, David? It's on f62v.
Posts: 2,247Threads: 177
Member details
Posts: 2,247
Threads: 177
Thanks Received: 397 in 324 posts
Thanks Given: 894
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
0
Country:
So here is the question. Do four valid points of circumstantial evidence serve to identify something that cannot be seen?
First, it is hexagonal. Second, it is VMs C-14 contemporary as of 1405. Third, it has a Burgundian connection to the Golden Fleece. Among other Burgundian connections. And fourth, it connects to Dijon and with La Sainte Hostie de Dijon. Pairied and validated, historical connections to Dijon, capital of the Burgundian state through the C-14 dates. It's common history that ties them together.
Is it enough?