17-08-2019, 10:51 PM
|
Flower recycling
|
|
I've wondered about that for a while.
They definitely used a formula for the faces. From looking at thousands of manuscripts, it becomes evident that hat's how many of them were taught to draw so they could do it quickly—a certain sequence, for example, cheek, jaw, forehead, nose, skull... then add eyes, ears, nose and other details. The drawing of flowers could be systemized to some extent, as well. The morning glory family has a certain kind of petal, the daisy family has a certain kind of petal, etc. But even though the petals are drawn the same, these flowers are not identical from a botanical point of view:
There was an effort to individualize key features, even if the petals are drawn the same. The plants do not appear to be the same species. When the shape of the petals is the same, as they are in many species (look at how similar many daisy and sunflower plants look), often the calyx and leaves are used to distinguish one from another. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)