(16-06-2026, 06:26 PM)JustAnotherTheory Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Here is the MD5 of the main proposition, since such things seem to be the common practice around here:
ec1581a8934c179303b8bd94c58ccc9d
This isn't common practice, and I hope it doesn't become common practice.
In any case, MD5 isn't secure.
I would not be surprised if, nowadays, any of the better LLM's are capable of generating a piece of text for a given MD5.
Not that it matters much in this context
Are these MD5 things done because people fear their ideas will be stolen before they can fully publish them?
This is futile, all future solutions and discoveries have already been found by me and are covered by an anagram in this post: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Just in case there are any doubts, this md5 hash will cover them too: dabdabdabb007caf2cf47292d4077605
Hope this clears up the situation with anagrams and signatures and we can get back to discussions
Has there been any research into the possibility that the VMS is an elaborate MD5 hash protecting the priority of the author's Linear A decryption?
(10 hours ago)rikforto Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Has there been any research into the possibility that the VMS is an elaborate MD5 hash protecting the priority of the author's Linear A decryption?
Was such encryption possible in the Middle Ages?
(10 hours ago)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (10 hours ago)rikforto Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Has there been any research into the possibility that the VMS is an elaborate MD5 hash protecting the priority of the author's Linear A decryption?
Was such encryption possible in the Middle Ages?
If people can translate the VMS using modern dictionaries and unsound etymologies, I am allowed to have this one
(10 hours ago)rikforto Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (10 hours ago)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (10 hours ago)rikforto Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Has there been any research into the possibility that the VMS is an elaborate MD5 hash protecting the priority of the author's Linear A decryption?
Was such encryption possible in the Middle Ages?
If people can translate the VMS using modern dictionaries and unsound etymologies, I am allowed to have this one
I'm not very familiar with programming, but I can confidently say that the author didn't know what hashing was.
Or maybe I didn't understand you from the very beginning...
I'm sorry bad english but md5 is not reverse hackable, it is computationally imposible, md5 is strong into one direction but not the other
(7 hours ago)Jimmy123 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm sorry bad english but md5 is not reverse hackable, it is computationally imposible, md5 is strong into one direction but not the other
Really? What about dictionary attack (it seems to be used in John the Ripper)? Or RainbowCrack?