ThomasCoon > 26-09-2016, 09:11 PM
(26-09-2016, 03:37 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Thomas - In that case I would argue that the "o" in itself is an article or something similar. In that case the surface appearance of "4o" as a meaningful unit would just be the result of "and" and an article being stuck to the beginning of words. I guess this ties in to the "gallows mark nouns" hypothesis.
Koen G > 26-09-2016, 09:27 PM
-JKP- > 27-09-2016, 12:40 AM
(26-09-2016, 09:27 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So would "o" be one type of article then, and 4o the other? This would explain de distribution as well as the fact that 4o is rare in labels. It is conceivable that some articles used in full text are not used for single words. Or are you thinking about a different type of words?
Koen G > 29-09-2016, 03:27 PM
Quote:AFAIK, most of this also holds for other Afroasiatic (Hamitic/Semitic) languages like Hebrew, Ancient Egyptian, Geez, etc.
Ruby Novacna > 29-09-2016, 08:18 PM
Koen G > 29-09-2016, 09:36 PM
MarcoP > 30-09-2016, 09:22 AM
(29-09-2016, 08:18 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think "q" means rather "d", "qo" =do ou d'
Ruby Novacna > 30-09-2016, 04:01 PM
MarcoP > 30-09-2016, 05:11 PM
(30-09-2016, 04:01 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You have a great confidence in your letter frequencies, because you take for an axiom that the text is written in a single language.