David
I am currently unraveling these pages, and my insights are still evolving. I am getting more certain about five folios in the bathing section: f76v, f80r, f80v, You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. and f79v.
Roughly speaking, I think what happened is the following:
1) At the base, we have information about stars and constellations. Think of a star chart, a list of constellations, a celestial sphere... Those kinds of things.
2) Someone took this information and tried to make it easier to learn. He did so by arranging the constellations more-or-less in the structure of Greek myth.
Think of a memory palace, an imaginary place in your mind where you put images, concepts, names... to make them easier to recall. In these five VM pages, the memory palace is the narrative structure, and the matter to be memorized relates to the constellations.
Because what we get is a blend between story and constellation, neither is a perfect match. There are no constellations raping each other. It's an exercise of balance.
Either way, I wouldn't call all nymphy interactions peaceful and harmonious.
I think the water in these five folios represents the horizontal circles on the celestial sphere: the Tropics, equator, poles. When a nymph's hand touches water, it means the constellation's hand crosses a circle. If a nymph is half submerged, it means the constellation is crossed by the circle around the waist. And so on.
This isn't too unusual: the position of constellations was often determined by reference to the circles.
In my most recent blog posts, I've started comparing the nymphs to the constellations on the Farnese Atlas, just as an initial exploration. This is how it works:
The full post with more examples is here: You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Depending on how much time I find today, I'm posting more of them soon.
Vviews:
I have at one point proposed that the whole bathy section illustrates the Metamorphoses, but that is not a view I have entertained for very long. On May 15 I replied to a question of yours on Bax's site that I think the truth is way more complex, in summary:
Quote:I did consider the possibility of a mere illustrated metamorphoses for a while, but have abandoned that again. I strongly suspect the metamorphoses scenes are not the main purpose of the text.
I have noticed that all myths I have found so far, relate to navigation or naval voyages in general. ....
So there’s a definite theme to the material, which is one of the several reasons why I think it’s likely the text is not *just* Ovid.
Another is that the labels don’t match the names of the characters, and indeed on some folios the characters aren’t labelled at all.
Also, why is the narrative “thread” represented by tubes and flows of water and “lakes” and so on?
I’ll just say that I don’t know the answer to that question right now. I prefer to see it, at the moment, as matter that for some reason has been “enriched” with a visual mythological narrative.
I am quite confident about my analyses of the narrative structure, but there are still plenty of things to be clarified…
So now I have come to a better understanding of why the Ovidian narrative has been loosely overlayed on some of the nymphs: it's to help the intended audience memorize the constellations.