I do not doubt this is possible to some very talented people, the question is - how likely is it?
The issue with your reproduction is the following:
The plant image is very closely copied from the original. The artist improved it, but the overlap is crazily accurate. Some scans / photographs of the VM have a worse overlap with each other due to not being absolutely parallel to the source than your image matches with some scans. That means your reproduction matches key points better than a sloppy photo. Why did the artist put such emphasis on this accuracy if he wasn't interested in doing a faithful copy to begin with?
The text on the other hand is not only inaccurate glyph-wise, it also varies in alignment, some parts matching perfectly while others are curved differently from all the known scans. I therefore do not believe that your reproduction was copied from one of the scans or phptographs we examined. All scans have some sort of distortion. And because it is a book and not a scan of a single page, it hass some curvature. How much depends on a lot of factors.
In my opinion, the text inaccuracies are the effect of either an imperfect source (like a bad b&W scan), or an inaccurate projection method (convex mirror). The chance that this is a free-hand copy? If you ask me, zero. Not only due the required skill, it also makes no sense from an artistic perspective. Furthermore, the projection method must have been fairly accurate.
From voynich.nu
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Are images of these reproductions accessible?
The British Library (formerly British Museum)
MS Facs 461 - Positive photocopies of ff. 1-56 of the Voynich MS.
The George C. Marshall Library in Lexington (Va.)
Item 1600 - William F. Friedman's photostatic copy of the Voynich MS
Item 1610 - Photostat positive of pages of the Voynich MS
The New York Public Library
The NY Public Library used to own a complete photostatic copy of the Voynich MS. It should still be there
There clearly were a number of copies made from the original photostats, all probably with their own distortion.