• Options
• Login
• Desktop Style

'P' is the key

• Index

  • The Voynich Ninja
  • Voynich Research
  • Theories & Solutions
  • 'P' is the key
• 'P' is the key

• RE: 'P' is the key

  pjburkshire > 3 hours ago

  (3 hours ago)Loose_Spell_9313 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
  That said, sometimes ideas simply require time to catch wind.
  

  
  
  How long are you expecting it to take?

• RE: 'P' is the key

  Loose_Spell_9313 > 2 hours ago

  (3 hours ago)pjburkshire Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

  (3 hours ago)Loose_Spell_9313 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
  That said, sometimes ideas simply require time to catch wind.
  

  
  
  How long are you expecting it to take?

  
  I find it amusing how you can't actually argue the evidence presented so it keeps resulting in personal attacks. 
  
  I'd assume as long as a chemical analysis would take between 'Map with Ship' and p.68 of the folio. The simple test would prove me wrong and silence this entire line of inquiry. So I guess when that happens.

• RE: 'P' is the key

  pjburkshire > 2 hours ago

  (2 hours ago)Loose_Spell_9313 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
  I'd assume as long as a chemical analysis would take between 'Map with Ship' and p.68 of the folio. The simple test would prove me wrong and silence this entire line of inquiry. So I guess when that happens.
  

  
  
  That may be what it will take for you to stop believing in your Marco Polo/Arctic Circle clock idea but that is not what I was asking.  What I was asking was: How long do you think it will take for anyone here to start believing your idea?  I think the only way people will believe it is if there is a proven translation of the text.

• RE: 'P' is the key

  Loose_Spell_9313 > 2 hours ago

  (2 hours ago)pjburkshire Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

  (2 hours ago)Loose_Spell_9313 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
  
  I'd assume as long as a chemical analysis would take between 'Map with Ship' and p.68 of the folio. The simple test would prove me wrong and silence this entire line of inquiry. So I guess when that happens.
  
  

  
  
  
  
  That may be what it will take for you to stop believing in your Marco Polo/Arctic Circle clock idea but that is not what I was asking.  What I was asking was: How long do you think it will take for anyone here to start believing your idea?  I think the only way people will believe it is if there is a proven translation of the text.

  
  The answer remains the same. Once the test proves that they were, or were not, in fact stained by the same thing, the rest of my arguments (pertaining to the arctic circle/polos) also gain additional credibility- or fall apart entirely. If correct, it becomes another verifiable aspect of the book's chain of custody, thus directly relating it to the author of 'Map with Ship' and in proximity to the Polos. 
  
  What I would like for you to prove: 
  
  (1) a different geographic position can be deduced from the proto-clock (or whatever your interpretation of it is)
  (2) the stains between 'Map with Ship' & VM (p.68) show no significant signs of overlap

• RE: 'P' is the key

  pjburkshire > 23 minutes ago

  (2 hours ago)Loose_Spell_9313 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
  What I would like for you to prove: 
  
  (1) a different geographic position can be deduced from the proto-clock (or whatever your interpretation of it is)
  (2) the stains between 'Map with Ship' & VM (p.68) show no significant signs of overlap
  

  
  
  1)  I don't see a clock.  I see a calendar.  I think the calendar on f67r1 "points" to some place on Planet Earth that has a Moon that roughly divides one Earth year into about 12 parts.
  
  2)  I see no value in commenting on this one.

• RE: 'P' is the key

  Loose_Spell_9313 > 17 minutes ago

  (23 minutes ago)pjburkshire Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

  (2 hours ago)Loose_Spell_9313 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
  What I would like for you to prove: 
  
  (1) a different geographic position can be deduced from the proto-clock (or whatever your interpretation of it is)
  (2) the stains between 'Map with Ship' & VM (p.68) show no significant signs of overlap
  

  
  
  1)  I don't see a clock.  I see a calendar.  I think the calendar on f67r1 "points" to some place on Planet Earth that has a Moon that roughly divides one Earth year into about 12 parts.
  
  2)  I see no value in commenting on this one.

  
  So in other words, you can't. Got it. Thank you. 
  
  I will not be engaging with you going forward. You have some weird internalized rage for me and this proposal that you have gone as far as attacking me both directly here and indirectly through your actions with your own content, truly inexplicable behavior. I can find no logical reason someone would put that much effort into attacking the person rather than attacking the evidence proposed. One I will allow, one I will not.
• Next Oldest Next Newest