Koen G > 22-02-2026, 12:47 PM
(22-02-2026, 12:40 PM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As for Barbara, I'm less convinced by this. I think there's some coincidences, but right now my feeling is that's all they are...
MarcoP > 22-02-2026, 02:29 PM
(22-02-2026, 10:04 AM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The question is what happened to the original notebook (Palatino 766)? I tried to inquire its provenience from BNCF but got no reply. I understand they are busy. But please, if someone, preferably Italian (hint-Marco) could look into this, I am sure it would help us greatly. We must know how and when Palatino 766 ended up in the Florence Library and where it was before!!
”Prager and Scaglia” Wrote:There is no evidence in Palat.766 that Sigismund, to whom it is dedicated, received this particular manuscript, or accepted it, or made it part of any library of his. However, there is indirect evidence that Mariano did not keep it. While the condition of Lat. 197 suggests that a book that stayed with Taccola soon changed its aspect, Palat.766 contains no significant additions of notes or insertion of sketches. There are minor supplements relating to woodwork near the end of Palat.766, apparently unrelated to his plan for the treatise. He made these drawings probably during a relatively short time that he retained the codex. Substantially nothing is added by persons other than Taccola. Since several of the Quattrocento copies of Palat.766 are of Sienese origin, we are inclined to think that the codex remained in Siena for some decades. In modern times, Palat.766 and the copybook, Palat. 767, appear together in Florence. This copybook, to be described later, belonged to the Strozzi family in the seventeenth century, and the autograph may also have belonged to this family of humanists. The Strozzi were book collectors even before Taccola's time. We do not know exactly when or how these two manuscripts came to the Biblioteca Nazionale, and the catalogs do not specify.
Bernd > 22-02-2026, 04:48 PM
Bernd > 23-02-2026, 08:39 PM
(23-02-2026, 03:29 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well, for starters, I don't think a hypothetical copy of book 3+4 for the emperor would have necessarily gone to Barbara. But since we don't even know whether such a copy existed, musing about its destination is compounding speculations.
What I find more likely is that someone else got the chance to browse Taccola's autograph, or even the sketches he made in preparation. We know that he was concerned about copyright, but it's not like he was writing in some dungeon, hissing at anyone who came too close. He worked as the secretary of the "Sapientia", a charitable organization for poor scholars, which also housed the court in 1432. It was also connected to a hospital. I mean, this guy was "out there", meeting students, international visitors, renaissance figures...
If only one of those had been allowed at any point to copy part of Taccola's work, that's enough to create a possible point of contact. We also don't know what happened to books 3+4 when they were finished. Unlike books 1+2, they were not added to by Taccola, so perhaps they were kept elsewhere.