funkylibrarian > 13-01-2026, 10:35 PM
rikforto > 7 hours ago
Jorge_Stolfi > 6 hours ago
(13-01-2026, 10:35 PM)funkylibrarian Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Encode the text so that outsiders would not be able to read its contents

Quote:Adorn the encoded text with spurious and misleading images to serve as something of a misdirection; if someone was caught with a dangerous religious manuscript, outsiders might assume it was a simply a commonplace alchemy text of herbs, recipes, and incantationsThe problem with this idea is that the VMS images are all but commonplace, and would have created the suspicion of heretical contents, not avoided it. If that was the intention, the images should have contained at least some Christian imagery. But there is none; not even a church. (On the other hand, there is a tower in f85v2 that looks like a minaret. And the Jews were given the choice "convert or get out" in Spain, in the late 1400s, because they had been too much at home with the recently expelled Moors...)
Quote:The parchment was carefully preparedHowever it is full of defects like stains, holes, creases, and irregular edges. It looks more like "factory rejects" than just "second choice". From what I know, it would have been totally unacceptable for a Torah scroll.
Quote:The manuscript was heavily used: "Medievalist Lisa Fagan Davis describes the parchment as soft - a texture found in books that have been heavily thumbed.' This indicates the manuscript was handled or paged through a great deal."
Quote:The VM word count is "35,000 to 38,000 words and around 170,000 characters," and could be even longer as it is hypothesized that several pages of the VM are missing; this number is within a magnitude of the Torah, with 79,000 - 80,000 words and ~304,805 letters, especially if abbreviations or shorthand might be usedI am not sure I get the point here. But vellum manuscripts of the time came in all sizes, some much larger than the VMS or the Torah.
Quote:Some analyses show the VM text has an affiliation with HebrewNewbold was one of earliest modern "Voynichologists", and his opinions are now generally seen as naive. I believe that others have tried to match "Voynichese" to Hebrew or Arabic, but apparently no one succeeded. Those languages have a peculiar word morphology that does not match the structure of the VMS "words".