Rafal > 4 hours ago
![[Image: schema13.gif]](https://voynich.nu/q13/schema13.gif)
LisaFaginDavis > 4 hours ago
Rafal > 3 hours ago
LisaFaginDavis > 3 hours ago
Rafal > 2 hours ago
LisaFaginDavis > 2 hours ago
bi3mw > 1 hour ago
(2 hours ago)Rafal Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.When you work only with computer scans, all these folios, bifolios, quires and sewing are actually quite abstract
The format is fine, and it has, for example, an indicator of the respective (previously accepted) folio position at the bottom of each page.Rafal > 1 hour ago
Grove > 6 minutes ago
(3 hours ago)LisaFaginDavis Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Definitely folded, in which case, yes, 76r would be the first recto of the singulion.
The same is true for 105r, which also begins with a large glyph.
To answer your other question:
You can't bind singulions together in a medieval sewing structure. It wouldn't work, structurally. The bifolia would have been an unbound pile that was nested and bound later, likely by someone who didn't know what else to do with the bifolia.