eggyk > 28-06-2026, 08:14 PM
(28-06-2026, 05:47 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm afraid there's not much hope to further narrow down spelling variants to specific places or time-frames as I had hoped. Since we have a lot of latinized month name variants from South German speaking regions - do you think the Picard hypothesis is obsolete?
R. Sale > 28-06-2026, 08:20 PM
Koen G > 28-06-2026, 08:40 PM
Zauriek > 29-06-2026, 05:33 AM
nablator > 29-06-2026, 08:06 AM
(29-06-2026, 05:33 AM)Zauriek Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.By the way; i find very odd that the current best match comes from a French astrolabe. [The first entry with 7.5 score]
I'm assuming engraving a text requies a more strict representation of the base language (so, possible variantss were left off.)
Zauriek > 29-06-2026, 09:50 AM
(29-06-2026, 08:06 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There was no "strict" (standard) spelling.
eggyk > 29-06-2026, 10:24 AM
(29-06-2026, 08:06 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There was no "strict" (standard) spelling.
Zauriek > 29-06-2026, 11:04 AM
(29-06-2026, 10:24 AM)eggyk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In german, for sure. But in french? The spellings (for the month names at least) are remarkably consistent across hundreds of manuscripts.Maybe that is why old german borrowed terminology from the french and latin, they were trying to solidify a standard for month names and then they tried to make their own dutch-like nomenclature by making weird mixes, and with the gradual pass of time, the references were slowly solidifying due popularity referencing until the standard month names in dutch were made or maybe this is bonkers and the final dutch names for months were impossed by a king or something like @R. Sale said.
eggyk > 30-06-2026, 11:20 AM
Koen G > 30-06-2026, 12:25 PM