Koen G > 13-05-2026, 02:39 PM

eggyk > 13-05-2026, 07:06 PM
(13-05-2026, 01:01 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. initial "y" is absent from our sample. We have ignored this mostly, but it may be relevant.
Koen G > 20-05-2026, 07:29 PM
eggyk > 21-05-2026, 12:56 AM
Biographisch woordenboek der Nederlanden. Deel 20 Wrote:In the same year this work was also published in french, under the title: La description de l'Etat, Succes et faic de la Religion. Imprimé en Aougst 1569. Both of these editions are very rare.
...
In 1616, the dutch edition was already so unknown to a new publisher that they had the french edition transferred into [dutch]. It was also not agreed whether the work was originally written in [low saxon / low german] or french. Only later was it discovered that they appeared at the same time.
Koen G > 21-05-2026, 06:59 AM
eggyk > 21-05-2026, 10:47 AM
Koen G > 21-05-2026, 11:27 AM
oshfdk > 21-05-2026, 11:36 AM
MarcoP > 21-05-2026, 01:18 PM
eggyk > 21-05-2026, 01:18 PM
(21-05-2026, 11:36 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If these labels are written according to the usual spelling of some actual language/dialect, is there anything we can say about this language? This looks like a Romance language, however many languages seem to accept Roman month names (like in English or German), while not being Romance languages at all, so I suppose we can't really say anything about in which language the person who wrote these month names intended to write them?
Assuming for a moment that the language or the labels is related to the hypothetical plaintext language of the manuscript, do the labels put any restrictions at all on which plaintext languages we should consider?