nablator > Yesterday, 01:39 PM
(Yesterday, 12:43 PM)Dobri Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If it is pretty universal, please provide an example of the use of sideways (flying) letter 'm' in a non-Beneventan script.
Dobri > Yesterday, 01:40 PM
(Yesterday, 01:21 PM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It is a part of every investigation to deal with circumstantial evidence to connect the dots.(Yesterday, 01:02 PM)Dobri Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well, at least one symbol in the cipher manuscript can be identified with some certainty for the past hundred years of research.
"With some certainty" is not yet justified.
I wrote You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ages ago. The similarity is good, and I dare say that this is objective. Still I am not sure that it is not coincidental.
There was a whole thread here (or in Stephen Bax's blog) showing that the same symbol was used as a paragraph marker in Spanish manuscripts. I would not know how to search for that but perhaps someone else remembers.
(Yesterday, 01:39 PM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Apparently, your examples are not concerned with suprascript.(Yesterday, 12:43 PM)Dobri Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If it is pretty universal, please provide an example of the use of sideways (flying) letter 'm' in a non-Beneventan script.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
R. Sale > Yesterday, 07:55 PM
(Yesterday, 01:19 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are many symbols in the Voynich MS that look like something or other. I think it takes more than just visual similarity to conclusively prove that the scribe had some particular symbol in mind when writing a certain shape.
oshfdk > 2 hours ago
(Yesterday, 07:55 PM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If it takes more than just visual similarity, what more does it take?
Dobri > 1 hour ago
(2 hours ago)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I guess some meaningful context or a system that unites visually similar features. If a single item in the MS matches very well visually with something else, this is a good reason for investigation, but this is not a good reason to just claim that A is B, case solved.
oshfdk > 41 minutes ago
(1 hour ago)Dobri Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The system that unites visually similar features of not just one but several items (sideways flying 'm', 'V' and 'U', possibly 'G" and 'C', and an 'O' shaped shield) is the Beneventan script.
The most striking feature is the suprascript of said 'm' which is unique to the Beneventan script.
(1 hour ago)Dobri Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The breakthrough here is the realization that the red embellishments in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are actually readable Latin letters.
One could continue doubt it to a certain extent. However, there is now a new line of investigation that has never been considered before.