oshfdk > 27-04-2025, 09:31 PM
Urtx13 > 27-04-2025, 11:20 PM
(27-04-2025, 03:18 PM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Two small issues in preprocess_eva_seed.py:
1. It extracts at token_index = 0 the folio ID ($F) from the page header line:
f1r,0,a,0
...
f1v,0,a,0
...
f2r,0,b,228
...
f2v,0,b,228
The test line.strip().startswith("<!") doesn't work because line includes the line header.
2. It keeps comments between "<!" and ">" that should be skipped. For example:
f1r,13,doodle,13
Note: the removal of comments would also fix the page header issue because the page header is a comment. Something like this would work: line = line.remove(r"<!.*?>")
For checking the stability of results you could try You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. the "reference" transliteration (no comments, no extended EVA). The Takeshi Takahashi transliteration is outdated (1999).
Urtx13 > 28-04-2025, 12:00 PM
davidd > Yesterday, 02:32 PM
Urtx13 > Yesterday, 02:53 PM
(Yesterday, 02:32 PM)davidd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hi Urtx13,
I only skimmed this thread but maybe you can address this question i have based on the code in the github:
Is this summary correct:
You seem to train a TF classifier model on the complete voynich, all folios, with some value added to each folio during training.
Then you test the model and all the folios come back correctly identified by the classifier model.
This is not how you normally test classifiers. Normally when you have limited example data, you remove part of the data from the training, and validate that your classifier trained on the other data is classifying the removed parts correctly. When you present a classifier with data it was trained on, it will give you the classification it was trained to produce. Maybe this process is hidden in one of the libraries you call, but i dont see it happen inside your code itself.
Can you elaborate on this?
Pepper > Yesterday, 04:40 PM
Urtx13 > 4 hours ago
(Yesterday, 04:40 PM)Pepper Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm a maths ignoramus so finding it hard to follow the details of this theory, but I have a question - if the folios are not in their original order but have been reshuffled over the years, does the cyclical pattern still hold up?