There seems to be something weird with the leaves of f65r.
Most plants in the VMS have leaves arranged in opposite pairs along a stem or branch, with either a single full-size leaf at the tip or a full-size pair. (Few if any have a branch or stem ending with a few smaller leaves and an apical leaf bud, as many real plants do.)
Apparently the idea of whoever devised the drawing of the You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. plant was to follow that model. And indeed there is one pair of leaves that fits that model: namely, the third one from the top along the left margin. The branch arrives at that pair in the NE diretion, makes a sharp 90° turn to NW at that point, then turns back to NE with a smooth curve. One leaf of the pair is drawn in front of the branch,the other behind it. Each of these two leaves is symmetrical with (in this case) four lobes on each side and one at the tip. The leaves do not seem to have stalks, but attach dierctly to the branch at a single point.
The unpaired leaves at the branch tips look the same, although some may have five lobes on each side, instead of four.
However, every leaf pair other than that one seems to have been mashed into a single mis-shaped monster leaf that grows sideways out from the branch like a broad two-sided battle-ax. Measured on the page, branches are only 2-3 mm wide, but the base of these "siamese" leaves are ~10 mm wide.
How could this happen? Perhaps the scribe misunderstood the Author's sketch, or the alchemical herbal he was supposed to copy the leaves from?
All the best, --jorge