amelkin > 04-05-2024, 03:34 PM
amelkin > 05-05-2024, 07:09 PM
amelkin > 07-05-2024, 09:03 PM
pjburkshire > 07-05-2024, 09:27 PM
(07-05-2024, 09:03 PM)amelkin Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.2 duplicates of circular diagrams "Aberil" and "May" ( You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. vs You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. vs f72r1 ( You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ) ) were made by 2 different people. They differ syntactically and stylistically and very likely belong to two different versions of the Voynich Manuscript. What is the point of duplicating diagrams within one version of the manuscript?
RobGea > 08-05-2024, 04:42 PM
(07-05-2024, 09:03 PM)amelkin Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What is the point of duplicating diagrams within one version of the manuscript?
amelkin > 09-05-2024, 08:43 AM
(07-05-2024, 09:27 PM)pjburkshire Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.They had more to say than would fit on one.
(08-05-2024, 04:42 PM)RobGea Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You might be right, but considering the other 8 zodiac folios have approx. 30 nymphs each
and then Aries has 2 folios of 15 nymphs (2x15 =30), same for Taurus.
Then the question becomes why has Aries + Taurus been split into 2 ?
And pjburkshire's answer is totally valid.
P.S if they (2xAries, 2xTaurus) differ both stylistically and semantically then they are not duplicates, but thats just me being pedantic. :)
pjburkshire > 09-05-2024, 10:19 AM
(09-05-2024, 08:43 AM)amelkin Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In this case, these paired diagrams would be on the same page and would be executed in the same style.
amelkin > 09-05-2024, 05:00 PM
(09-05-2024, 10:19 AM)pjburkshire Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So what are you saying? Are you saying the entire Voynich Manuscript is an A.I. generated hoax? Are you saying there is no book at all?
nablator > 09-05-2024, 05:24 PM
(09-05-2024, 05:00 PM)amelkin Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This is an imitation of a fortune-telling book for white magic sessions in closed communities of noble women.
amelkin > 09-05-2024, 08:58 PM
(09-05-2024, 05:24 PM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.No it's not. Writing it in bold does not make it more credible. As evidence-less "theories" go these days, this is one of the weakest. Who would use a herbal (mostly) for magic and fortune telling instead of a proper astrology book or magic grimoire? Astrology and magic had internal logic and well established traditions, they're not like, pick any book, tell any kind of mumbo-jumbo. Is your (totally wrong) idea that noble women were so uneducated that they would do anything, no matter how silly?