MarcoP > 31-05-2023, 09:44 PM
(31-05-2023, 06:16 PM)februs Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(30-05-2023, 08:58 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are many copies of the so-called handy tables, but it is only this manuscript (Vat.Gr.1291, in the Vatican library) that has this particular illustration.
It is long ago that I looked at this, and I have some vague memories of what I read about it, which is probably not reliable.
Please note that Nick Pelling also wrote about it in 2017:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
the site explains that the pic is 「 A beautifully illustrated copy of Ptolemy’s Handy Tables」.
so is the pic handy table, isn't it? (@_@)
(26-05-2023, 05:52 AM)februs Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I can understand if Handy table was made for a specific year.
but Handy table was made for convenience.
so if Handy table was made for a long time, inconsistent with black and white woman.
what does that mean??
Rene Wrote:The labels written near the nymphs define the date and time in which the Sun enters the zodiac sign depicted in the outermost ring. Boll (1899) calculates from these labels that they are valid for the 3rd Century, but Neugebauer quotes a publication (van der Waerden, 1954) indicating that he was wrong, and that it should be 9th century instead.
februs > 04-06-2023, 05:46 PM