MarcoP > 27-12-2022, 06:36 PM
(27-12-2022, 10:20 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.These two marks tend to align most with the pharmaceutical text (yellow crosses) [...]
ReneZ > 28-12-2022, 02:14 AM
(27-12-2022, 06:36 PM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(27-12-2022, 10:20 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.These two marks tend to align most with the pharmaceutical text (yellow crosses) [...]
Hi Rene,
unless I messed up something in the top plot You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., the bigram that makes f58 different from pharma is 'eo'. That bigram is typical of pharmacese, where it is three times more frequent than in f58 (~6% vs ~2%).
ReneZ > 28-12-2022, 08:34 AM
(27-12-2022, 05:15 PM)nickpelling Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(27-12-2022, 04:05 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This shows the fraction of "ed" bigrams over the pages. The light grey crosses are the zodiac pages, which we know are in the right order, and should realistically be of similar subject matter. Here we see the "ed" bigram count increase from zero to something distinctly non-zero.
The zodiac pages consist of circular text and labels, and the vast majority of these bigrams occur in the circular text, where also the increase is being observed. However, the increase is also seen in the labels. In the early signs, they do not occur. In the later signs they start to appear.
I guess the big question is whether there is a different feature that decreases as the ed bigram count increases.
Aga Tentakulus > 29-12-2022, 01:20 PM
Aga Tentakulus > 29-12-2022, 01:26 PM