pf0072 > 29-11-2025, 06:04 AM
(11-03-2023, 10:44 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(11-03-2023, 02:37 AM)mja0075 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You need to click solve again on the main window after setting the numbers for the polyphones. (not very intuitive)
I did. It reopens the same "Polyphones" dialog.![]()
Maybe there is something else that needs to be set ?
I would prefer a true polyalphabetic substitution mode with 3 alphabets, polyphones are much more difficult to solve.
For the "Substitution + monoalphabetic groups" the "Solve" button displays:
Error: input dimensions cannot exceed 100 by 100
Note: the big 8-grams file (beijinghouse) was loaded correctly after I re-compressed it with gzip. Thanks for the links.
mja0075 > 10-06-2026, 01:01 AM
oshfdk > 10-06-2026, 06:52 AM
(10-06-2026, 01:01 AM)mja0075 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Byatan's key has a lot of overlaps and repeats, which is perhaps why it stunted us for so long. We needed to be solving for polyphones too.
However, @nablator your breakdown was very good, and even got the two four character keys.
nablator > 10-06-2026, 09:17 AM
f+ii is also fi+i
f+iii is also fi+ii
f+ia is also fi+a
F+ii is also Fi+i
F+iii is also Fi+ii
F+ia is also Fi+a
q+iii is also qii+i
na+a is also n+aa
na+e is also n+ae
na+i is also n+ai
Ti+ii is also T+iii
Ti+a is also T+ia
Ti+i is also T+ii
Ka+a is also K+aa
Ka+e is also K+ae
Ka+i is also K+ai
fa+a is also f+aa
fa+e is also f+ae
fa+i is also f+ai
Ki+ii is also K+iii
Ki+a is also K+ia
Ki+i is also K+iioshfdk > 10-06-2026, 09:23 AM
(10-06-2026, 09:17 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Thank you so much! I wasn't expecting a polyphonic cipher, and I wasn't expecting so many ambiguities in the breakdown, even when "iiu" and "YNh" are removed (no need for "z" as it's not in the plaintext):
nablator > 10-06-2026, 09:50 AM
(10-06-2026, 09:23 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So, is this generally just a bad quality cipher that would be a pain to read? Are there many cases when ambiguities both resolve to common plaintext combinations?
Koen G > 10-06-2026, 09:59 AM
nablator > 10-06-2026, 10:11 AM
(10-06-2026, 09:59 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The ambiguities seem a bit arbitrary? In the sense that they could probably be avoided with some optimization?
RobGea > 10-06-2026, 04:51 PM
mja0075 > 10-06-2026, 04:58 PM
(10-06-2026, 06:52 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Congratulations! How practical is it for reading if used as an actual cipher? Is it always simple to determine the boundaries between the positions?
(10-06-2026, 06:52 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Could you share some details of how you managed to crack it?
(10-06-2026, 04:51 PM)RobGea Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Respect to nablatorAgreed!