-JKP- > 28-06-2020, 11:01 AM
(28-06-2020, 10:42 AM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(28-06-2020, 10:33 AM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
MarcoP Wrote:Obviously positional characteristics of glyphs have little to do with languages or numbers and everything to do with the writing systems used to represent them.
-JKP- > 28-06-2020, 11:32 AM
Anton > 28-06-2020, 01:55 PM
ReneZ > 28-06-2020, 02:11 PM
Alin_J > 28-06-2020, 02:15 PM
(28-06-2020, 01:55 PM)Anton Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It's curious but it appears that there is the upper limit for the frequency of a particular word length, and it is 1000 (in my previous post where the size was 6818 the highest frequency was 934, i.e. not reaching the limit yet). This means that however large is the corpus of Roman numbers, there will be no more than 1000 of the same length. Which is counter-intuitive and really curious.
Anton > 28-06-2020, 02:55 PM
(28-06-2020, 02:11 PM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Could it be that your method to convert to Roman numerals keeps adding more M's for numbers greater than thousand? (For example 6001 = MMMMMMI )
Anton > 28-06-2020, 03:00 PM
(28-06-2020, 02:15 PM)Alin_J Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It just means that the limit is increasing exponentially (the number of possible combinations of words one character longer will be a multiple of the number of combinations of the shorter word length) and you are far from reaching the next step with that vocabulary size, but technically there is no limit.
Anton > 28-06-2020, 03:45 PM
Anton > 28-06-2020, 04:17 PM
Anton > 28-06-2020, 04:21 PM