R. Sale > 22-05-2020, 07:15 PM
Searcher > 22-05-2020, 08:11 PM
(21-05-2020, 04:46 PM)PaulW Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Koen G > 22-05-2020, 10:20 PM
Searcher > 22-05-2020, 10:27 PM
(22-05-2020, 10:20 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Maybe, it's a wrong word. I mean, after deletion of "y" at the end.(22-05-2020, 08:11 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Added P.S.What would you replace it with?
Has anyone checked the statistics of endings in the VMs after replacing the final “y”? How much will this change?
Torsten > 22-05-2020, 10:28 PM
(22-05-2020, 08:11 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Has anyone checked the statistics of endings in the VMs after replacing the final “y”? How much will this change?
Searcher > 22-05-2020, 10:34 PM
(22-05-2020, 10:28 PM)Torsten Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.40 % of the word-tokens end with [-y] (15409 out of 37919 tokens). The most common word types ending in [-y] are [chedy]/[shedy], [chey]/[shey], [chy]/[shy], and [qoky]/[oky]/[qoty]/[oty]. Therefore it is no surprise that the most common glyphs before the final-[y] are [d], [e], [ch], and [k].Well, it looks better.
There are 17655 words containing EVA-[y]. The glyphs before [-y-] are
in 6850 cases [d] (38.8 %)
in 4034 cases [e] (22.8 %)
in 2329 cases [h] (13.2 %)
in 1360 cases a gallow glyph (7.7 %).
Ruby Novacna > 23-05-2020, 11:18 AM
Quote:Searcher : I decided to go astray from the theory in order to try out a new approach over time, but even after six months or a year I begin to walk in circles. It is very difficult to completely move away from your theory.Yulia, why try to forget your theory? Don't we say that the first impression is the right one? Perhaps consider it differently, not attacking the entire manuscript, but choosing a section or a page or a few keywords per section? Take advantage of explaining your choice of reading letters when it differs from EVA? Examine the labels? In short, do not consider without proof that the manuscript is written in one language and without encryption. I sincerely believe that Latin words cannot be missing in such a long text, your knowledge of Latin can make things happen.
-JKP- > 23-05-2020, 12:14 PM
Searcher > 23-05-2020, 01:38 PM
(23-05-2020, 11:18 AM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Yulia, why try to forget your theory? Don't we say that the first impression is the right one? Perhaps consider it differently, not attacking the entire manuscript, but choosing a section or a page or a few keywords per section? Take advantage of explaining your choice of reading letters when it differs from EVA? Examine the labels? In short, do not consider without proof that the manuscript is written in one language and without encryption. I sincerely believe that Latin words cannot be missing in such a long text, your knowledge of Latin can make things happen.Until I see that the theory works wholy, I will try to find the correct way. Sometimes I search for an absolutely different approach, sometimes try to rethink my own theory and change details. But it is really hard not return to the same track.
Ruby Novacna > 23-05-2020, 02:51 PM
(23-05-2020, 01:38 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I know that you work with the Greek theory,To be precise, I don't work "with Greek theory". I was drawn to the manuscript because I saw clearly several Slavic words in the botanical section. However in the bathing section, I think see several Greek words. I admit that I know more Greek words than Latin words, because Old-Slavic dictionaries systematically give the equivalents of words in Greek, rarely in Latin.
(23-05-2020, 12:14 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.it's a big mistake to zoom in on little sectionsI also don't think that reading the text by section would be a big mistake: the difference in languages has already been proven. Proper interpretation of the keywords in each section could advance our understanding.