Options

Alain Touwaide - Villa Mondragone - 14 Oct. 2019

     The structures at the top are not poppy-like at all. I think it's off-base to compare these flower heads to hard seed capsules. Poppy seed-pods are very distinctive and the petals (which are attached at the base, not at the top) drop off, so they do not look like this. The VMS flower-heads are like asters (see Centaurea) and are very very common, including the scaly patterns. You can see examples here:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Many plants in the aster family have rosette-arranged leaves, so there's a good chance that the VMS plant is from the aster family. I don't think there's any possibility that it is from the poppy family (and I think it is misleading to compare the shape of a flower calyx to a poppy capsule).


[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]
Touwaide Summary -  Wrote: The poppy-like capsules are combined with a sun-like flower in VMS [/font]You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and with emoji-like tiny "faces" in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. 


It's not a good idea to call these capsules, even when talking casually. Those are part of the flower calyx. The term "capsule" usually refers to the seed capsule which develops as the petals are falling away (or are completely gone). But... this has gone from French to Italian to English and it's easy for this kind of term to change in translation, so don't take this as a criticism, but rather as an observation. I know how hard it is to transfer terms through several languages.

I'm not sure why Touwaide mentions "emoji-like" tiny faces in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. . In medieval iconography, a dot inside a pod or stamen or other similar structure usually refers to pollen or seeds and I think it's more important to mention this than what is probably a coincidental resemblance to faces. In fact, one of them as three "eyes" which does not seem like a reference to faces.

[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]
Touwaide Summary -  Wrote: * [/font]You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. appears to combine nymphaea and lily


I think this is an incorrect assessment. This is not a combination plant. This is quite a good drawing of a plant from the Villarsia/Menyanthes family and the flower is pretty accurate (probably Nymphoides or frogbit group).



---

Touwaide Summary -  Wrote: [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] [/font]A medical manuscript that could be partly comparable with the Voynich herbal is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. The library dates it to the XV Century, but it could be much later, XVII or XVIII Century.


I'm very familiar with LJS 62. I've gone through it many times.

I'm not sure why Touwaide would consider this more similar to the VMS than others. There aren't a lot of plant drawings (only 10 folios) and they are similar to many herbal manuscripts. The snakes next to the roots in 8v are found in many manuscripts and are drawn with cross-hatching that was in style in late 15th-century and later. There's nothing especially remarkable about the drawings and unlike the VMS, most of the roots are quite simple and naturalistic. The leaves are naturalistic also. They do not look like they are mnemonic or symbolic. They're more similar to early 16th-century drawings than they are to older ones (or to the VMS).



As for the dating of the LJS 62...

I've learned to date Gothic Latin script fairly well, usually within a couple of decades, but I am not particularly good at dating Greek text. I can only narrow it down within about 100 or 200 years for some of them. So I cannot comment on when the main text was written (if I were forced to guess I would guess maybe late 15th century or 16th century, but I would not be confident about it).

However, I have gotten reasonably good at numbers—I've studied them extensively. The numbers in the contents and the foliation are mostly likely later than the 16th century (or possibly from the latter half of the 16th century, but I'm leaning toward 17th century. They may have been added sometime after the main text. Some of the ones on the back leaf look like they are even later (maybe as late as 19th or 20th century).


So, it's my belief that LJS 62 was created some time after the VMS, perhaps by about a century and I honestly don't find them that similar, at least not when other herbal manuscripts are included in the comparison

Just looking at it overall, I would be surprised if LJS 62 were earlier than 1480 and it might be up to 50 years later than that.



So, I do not think LJS 62 is early enough or similar enough to compare to the VMS (especially when so many manuscripts are more similar). I'm surprised he chose it as an example.


I hate writing responses like this. I had high hopes for learning something from Touwaide. I am disappointed. He might be an expert in his respective field, but his understanding of the VMS seems to me to be superficial.
  • RE: Alain Touwaide - Villa Mondragone - 14 Oct. 2019

    davidjackson > 19-10-2019, 07:33 PM

    I was quite intrigued to see that the modern forgery hypothesis got such a big mention, especially with no real justification other than an attempt to explain our failing to understand the book .
    The justification for it being a fake seems quite flimsy.
    I understand that the theory behind the woodworm holes is that they infested the original binding and only nibbled a little way into the book because they don't eat parchment, which seems a reasonable assumption.
    The other points can easily be rebutted.
  • RE: Alain Touwaide - Villa Mondragone - 14 Oct. 2019

    -JKP- > 19-10-2019, 09:26 PM

    I'm also surprised so much lip-service was given to forgery. It makes it sound like Touwaide is leaning in that direction.

    But I find it surprising that anyone would suggest that Voynich himself sat there for several months drawing medieval plant illustrations to create this manuscript. He was a book-seller, not a calligrapher.

    If someone forged the VMS, they would have to:

    • know how to convincingly write seven different styles of 15th and 16th-century writing (de Tepenecz, column text, foliation, quire numbers, 116v, color annotations, and VMS main text),
    • have an in-depth knowledge of Latin scribal conventions,
    • have an in-depth knowledge of numeral styles (which changed in this specific time-period),
    • have an in-depth knowledge of a small subset of medieval Zodiac traditions,
    • have an in-depth knowledge of medieval plant-drawing traditions,
    • have an in-depth knowledge of early 15th-century fashion,
    • have skill at using a quill pen (this is not easy, it is basically calligraphy on a material that tends to resist ink, and the quill sometimes has to be sharpened numerous times per page),
    • have an in-depth knowledge of how to make medieval inks and pigments AND the raw materials with which to make them,
    • have 100 sheets of clean 500-year-old vellum on hand, including sheets large enough to create several foldouts.
    And a lot more.

    How many years does it take a Voynich researcher to acquire the knowledge to understand all these things? Wilfrid Voynich did not have access to the Internet.
  • RE: Alain Touwaide - Villa Mondragone - 14 Oct. 2019

    Koen G > 19-10-2019, 09:44 PM

    I thought exactly the same, David. But this problem is not particular to Touwaide's talk; in overviews,  the modern forgery hypothesis is usually given equal footing, as if it's an equally viable possibility as the rest. This is a self-sustaining problem I think.
  • RE: Alain Touwaide - Villa Mondragone - 14 Oct. 2019

    RenegadeHealer > 19-10-2019, 11:06 PM

    (19-10-2019, 09:44 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I thought exactly the same, David. But this problem is not particular to Touwaide's talk; in overviews,  the modern forgery hypothesis is usually given equal footing, as if it's an equally viable possibility as the rest. This is a self-sustaining problem I think.

    To be fair, the VMS having no meaningful content *is* the null hypothesis. And somehow, some way, at least for now, the null hypothesis still stands. Don't get me wrong, I'm as taken aback as all of you guys at how much credence Prof. Touwaide appears willing to lend to the idea. I'm just saying it's not an unwarranted stance to take.
  • RE: Alain Touwaide - Villa Mondragone - 14 Oct. 2019

    -JKP- > 19-10-2019, 11:23 PM

    Meaningful content and forgery are two different issues.

    Whether it has meaningful content or not, I don't believe it was created in the 20th century.
  • RE: Alain Touwaide - Villa Mondragone - 14 Oct. 2019

    RenegadeHealer > 20-10-2019, 02:20 AM

    (19-10-2019, 11:23 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Meaningful content and forgery are two different issues.

    Whether it has meaningful content or not, I don't believe it was created in the 20th century.

    True. A 20th century forgery is a pretty bold claim to make.
  • Next Oldest Next Newest