MarcoP > 01-11-2017, 05:24 PM
(26-10-2017, 09:37 AM)VViews Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are 131 full-page plant illustration pages, aka Large Plant pages) in the Voynich Manuscript.
These are as follows:
Quire 1-7:
on f1v-56v (111 illustrations)
Quire 8:
on 57r, 65r & v, 66v (4 illustrations)
Quire 15:
on 87r & v; 90r1, r2, v1, v2 (6 illustrations)
Quire 17:
on 93r-96v (10 illustrations)
Among these, there are a few instances where two plants are depicted on a single page.
These are:
f27r, f40v, f42r, f43v, f87v.
Another way of looking at this total then, is to say there are 136 large plants depicted in the Voynich Manuscript.
But it is unclear to me whether some of these pages that show two plants are meant to depict two stages of growth of the same plant or two distinct plants.
VViews > 01-11-2017, 05:37 PM
MarcoP > 01-11-2017, 05:44 PM
(01-11-2017, 05:37 PM)VViews Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As for 35v: I guess this one is open to interpretation.
Of course, I tend to agree that this probably shows two plants intertwined in the oak&ivy style, as has been You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. on the forum in but I still feel this is ambiguous: as in the "edera nigra" illustrations, it could be the illustrator just meant to depict the vine and the support plant is just there as an accessory, and also they can both be seen emerging from the same root.
For the moment I will add this one as "ambiguous", unless there is a consensus here that it should be two.