RE: "De Balneis" - a recap
Diane > 23-10-2017, 08:37 AM
I think it reasonable to say that the Yale librarians have a long and happy history of interaction with Rene Zandbergen, beginning (?) with Rene's being associated with an Austrian television company which in making a documentary also paid for certain tests to be done.
The degree to which they have relied upon Rene's ideas and advice since then has been evident and is surely a compliment to Rene, who was long believed the 'only sane boy in the village' beyond the boundaries of the online community.
But this means that their 'mentioning' the same matter which Rene had been supporting and promoting for many years is no independent judgement, but a reflection of the Beinecke librarians' willingness to accept Rene's views on this and a number of other matters, not excluding the library's decision to alter its pagination in a way which confused the matter in earlier papers, but with which Rene found acceptable. He said, in fact, that "we" were happy with it.
Since no-one since .. whenever... Torasella made that comment appears to have troubled to investigate the validity of the supposed similarity, nor to produce anything like a solidly-based argument, what we have is nothing more than efforts to justify a momentary impression after the fact, with research aimed not at all at critically evaluating the likelihood of an actual connection, but merely creating an impression of validity, chiefly by that same cross-referencing of secondary and tertiary authors which in the last century kept the 'Roger wrote it' story the only story for almost a century. We see the same reliance on 'important names' rather than evidence and the same habit of deliberately ignoring all alternatives - in connection with the 'sunflower' story.
In short, this notion owes its survival - or so it seems from all the usual sources - entirely to the fact that Rene is a long-surviving Voynichero, and one who found this vague notion congenial, urging it thereafter in the context of his 'central European' hypothesis, scarcely conceived of before he espoused it.
I believe that Torasella owes a debt of gratitude to Rene for the constancy and persistence with which he has championed an idea that - had anyone attempted to present it as a formal argument -must have failed at the first post.