ReneZ > 03-07-2020, 04:18 PM
-JKP- > 03-07-2020, 04:29 PM
watson_flatline > 19-08-2023, 12:03 PM
(10-08-2017, 08:46 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I just noticed two days ago that the version of Takeshi's transciption that is in the interlinear file is quite different from the version on his web site.
First five line in interlinear file:
Quote:<f1r.P1.1;H> fachys.ykal.ar.ataiin.shol.shory.cthres.y.kor.sholdy-
<f1r.P1.2;H> sory.ckhar.o!r.y.kair.chtaiin.shar.are.cthar.cthar.dan-
<f1r.P1.3;H> syaiir.sheky.or.ykaiin.shod.cthoary.cthes.daraiin.sa-
<f1r.P1.4;H> o{&o'}oiin.oteey.oteos.roloty.cth*ar.daiin.otaiin.or.okan-
<f1r.P1.5;H> dair.y.chear.cthaiin.cphar.cfhaiin=
His version:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(I am not concerned about the comments and the wrappings, just the transcribed text.
I know that his transcription is being used by several people, and I wonder which of the two sources people tend to use.
I will try to contact him, to find out if he updated it in the meantime.
pjburkshire > 22-04-2024, 01:04 PM
nablator > 22-04-2024, 01:48 PM
(22-04-2024, 01:04 PM)pjburkshire Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What are the current thoughts for why almost 13% (or 9%) of the words end in "iin"? Is this some kind of artifact of the encryption process? Or is "iin" some kind of verb suffix like "-ing" and "-ed" in English "growing" and "curled"?
pjburkshire > 22-04-2024, 02:20 PM
nablator > 22-04-2024, 02:44 PM
(22-04-2024, 02:20 PM)pjburkshire Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That is what I thought but before I move on to Quire 13 which is much larger, I would like to know that I am using the best data.