davidjackson > 06-02-2017, 09:18 PM
Koen G > 06-02-2017, 09:23 PM
Anton > 06-02-2017, 09:55 PM
Koen G > 06-02-2017, 10:15 PM
davidjackson > 06-02-2017, 10:18 PM
Anton > 06-02-2017, 10:41 PM
Quote:For me it is perfectly possible that the manuscript is a copy or compendium of various older images, and that for some reason someone later added the text with it that we see now.
Quote:I believe like most people that the script is medieval, though I am not sure if it has to be 15th century. Does it?
davidjackson > 06-02-2017, 11:04 PM
Anton > 06-02-2017, 11:06 PM
Quote:Anton, it wouldn't matter because in our hypothetical scenario the scribe is putting together a compendium of facts but in his own fashion. So he interprets them in his own way and adding the cultural references he's used to.
Koen G > 06-02-2017, 11:18 PM
Anton > 06-02-2017, 11:26 PM