[split] VMS - a forgery?

[-JKP-]

[quote pid='9891' dateline='1481929220']

Bunny, the problem is not that it's an unaccepted methodology. The problem is that the interpretation is subjective.


If you use Stellar's methodology EXACTLY as he has laid it out, you WILL get different results from Stellar.

If I use his methodology EXACTLY as he laid it out, I will get different results from both of you.

If ANY researcher uses his methodology, every single one will get different results, some of them will be dramatically different.


Which one is right?

The correct one.

Bunny
[/quote]


Bunny, I don't mean this in a mean way, but that's a non-answer. It adds nothing to our understanding of the method or the results and it sidesteps the question.


My question was a sincere one. If twenty different people use the exact same method and get twenty widely differing answers, then of what value is the method? There is no way to know which of the interpretations is even close to the mark.