[split] VMS - a forgery?
#12
(17-12-2016, 12:12 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote pid='9891' dateline='1481929220']

Bunny, the problem is not that it's an unaccepted methodology. The problem is that the interpretation is subjective.


If you use Stellar's methodology EXACTLY as he has laid it out, you WILL get different results from Stellar.

If I use his methodology EXACTLY as he laid it out, I will get different results from both of you.

If ANY researcher uses his methodology, every single one will get different results, some of them will be dramatically different.


Which one is right?

[/quote]

The correct one.

Bunny
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 14-12-2016, 08:31 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by ThomasCoon - 15-12-2016, 11:04 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by ReneZ - 15-12-2016, 11:37 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by stellar - 16-12-2016, 02:35 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 12:00 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by -JKP- - 17-12-2016, 12:12 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 12:31 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by -JKP- - 17-12-2016, 02:44 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 07:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)