17-12-2016, 12:12 PM
(17-12-2016, 12:00 AM)bunny wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(16-12-2016, 02:35 AM)stellar wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I found a date its in my profile and I also put these guys to the test Bunny, regarding the VMS's authenticity. These people really are spot on here and have guided me in my blindness. Well I now think its still Gematria with a date for the VMS set at 1433. Thanks for the appraisal Bunny!
Again, I have to express that you have found a date that has been relevant to other researchers, who also used "unaccepted" methodology. You found 1546, though not by Gematria, which you link to Dee. It is also the date of birth of Tycho Brahe who has been a central theme in the VM to some researchers. 1546, another coincidence?
[...deleted for brevity...]
Bunny
Bunny, the problem is not that it's an unaccepted methodology. The problem is that the interpretation is subjective.
If you use Stellar's methodology EXACTLY as he has laid it out, you WILL get different results from Stellar.
If I use his methodology EXACTLY as he laid it out, I will get different results from both of you.
If ANY researcher uses his methodology, every single one will get different results, some of them will be dramatically different.
Which one is right?