01-02-2016, 06:01 PM
Dear Ms. Smith,
I don't believe Voynich Lite identifies any sounds of glyphs.
Voynich Lite is shown only to outline my deconstruction process and how it seems to work for almost every VMS word.
I invite others to try it for the words that only appear 8 or 9 times in the VMS. I predict the deconstruction groups and sequence will also work for most of them. It should work for almost all VMS words.
For the others, the words not deconstructing in accordance with Voynich Lite, I predict they should also deconstruct properly - if more of the proposed codes from the tables at my fumblydiddles.com site are added.
Only the codes found in the 505 most common VMS words are listed in Voynich Lite.
Voynich Lite is meant to be the simplified, but limited, proof of my proposed deconstruction process. That's all.
No sounds. No meanings. No complications. Only two exceptions out of 505 words.
Thank you.
Don of Tallahassee
I don't believe Voynich Lite identifies any sounds of glyphs.
Voynich Lite is shown only to outline my deconstruction process and how it seems to work for almost every VMS word.
I invite others to try it for the words that only appear 8 or 9 times in the VMS. I predict the deconstruction groups and sequence will also work for most of them. It should work for almost all VMS words.
For the others, the words not deconstructing in accordance with Voynich Lite, I predict they should also deconstruct properly - if more of the proposed codes from the tables at my fumblydiddles.com site are added.
Only the codes found in the 505 most common VMS words are listed in Voynich Lite.
Voynich Lite is meant to be the simplified, but limited, proof of my proposed deconstruction process. That's all.
No sounds. No meanings. No complications. Only two exceptions out of 505 words.
Thank you.
Don of Tallahassee