[split] VMS - a forgery?
#10
(16-12-2016, 02:35 AM)stellar wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I found a date its in my profile and I also put these guys to the test Bunny, regarding the VMS's authenticity.  These people really are spot on here and have guided me in my blindness.  Well I now think its still Gematria with a date for the VMS set at 1433.  Thanks for the appraisal Bunny! Smile

Again, I have to express that you have found a date that has been relevant to other researchers, who also used "unaccepted" methodology.  You found 1546, though not by Gematria, which you link to Dee.  It is also the date of birth of Tycho Brahe who has been a central theme in the VM to some researchers.  1546, another coincidence?

Your 1433 Gematria model, maybe along with druid influence, Wales and Ireland is where you seem to be heading and should keep going for sure.  Others used different methods and assumptions to basically come up with some of the same results as you are finding.  1546 is a key element, not just for you. You see Dee (maybe on a hypercube, which is one layer I think the cube has there), others see Tycho, all factual layers of the same manuscript it seems. 

Your piece on Dante is post 1433 and factual so bear that in mind, you may be covering a wider time range than expected.

Bunny
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 14-12-2016, 08:31 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by ThomasCoon - 15-12-2016, 11:04 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by ReneZ - 15-12-2016, 11:37 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by stellar - 16-12-2016, 02:35 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 12:00 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by -JKP- - 17-12-2016, 12:12 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 12:31 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by -JKP- - 17-12-2016, 02:44 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 07:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)