(15-12-2016, 09:43 AM)bunny wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Really? (Amazed, that is.)
There are people who also think it is a modern forgery, and others who site astronomy of Tycho and Kepler in the folios, none of which agree with the apparent C15th scenario or authorship dating. No one disagrees that it has the hallmarks of the C15th dating or that it was written on apparent C15th velum according to what we know of the C14 dating, but the signals are all very mixed, it fits many different things but not exactly, and the attached letter has the hallmark of bearing a copied signature. I am almost amazed that you don't know of these research findings and alternative views.
Bunny
I do know about them. I've been studying the VMS for over 8 years and I don't agree with them. I don't give any credence to the theory that it's a modern forgery.
And Marci used a scribe (it has been suggested this may have been because his eyesight was failing).