(31-01-2016, 11:35 PM)crezac wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are 25 characters in the set. (attach jpg illustrating each character)
I'm not sure you'll get agreement on this point.
We don't even know which ones might be ligatures and, since there appears to be more than one hand that has contributed to the main text (excluding marginalia), we're not even sure whether the "other hand" (or hands) has introduced additional glyphs or has misinterpreted or miswritten them.
Also, the more you study the characters, the more one realizes there are two or three glyphs that may have been overlooked as meaningful but uncommon characters and a couple that may not be two characters but may be intended to represent one.
We're not even sure if 4o is one character or two. These characters are usually written together, in this order, but there are exceptions. Are the exceptions mistakes? Are they exceptions (in the sense of the scribe needing to express something different) or is this a ligature?
You also need to define a "set". Do you mean the total number of unique glyphs or the total number of glyphs with individual meaning possibly related to sounds or letters? There may be null characters that contribute nothing linguistically.