[split] VMS - a forgery?
#1
(14-12-2016, 06:24 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote pid='9755' dateline='1481674532']

That's modern English. They didn't speak or spell English like this in the 15th century.

If you change even one letter, then the gematria number of the word changes and no longer matches the same word in Stellar's system.

For example, I've seen the word "money" in 16th-century documents, but only rarely and I haven't seen it in any 15th-century documents. It's a French word (and spelled variously), not English and certainly not spelled "money". In those days, they usually spoke of silver or ducats or pence or specific quantities rather than using a general term like "money".

Changing it to French spelling completely changes the gematria value, which means it wouldn't apply to the VMS word. Same with many of the other "decoded" words.

[/quote]

There is nothing that suggests to me it is factually a C15th manuscript in content and the language would be more modern.  Of all the languages people have looked at in modern times they do seem to find contemporaneous word structure, again something I will be looking at in my hypothesis.

Bunny
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 14-12-2016, 08:31 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by ThomasCoon - 15-12-2016, 11:04 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by ReneZ - 15-12-2016, 11:37 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by stellar - 16-12-2016, 02:35 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 12:00 AM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by -JKP- - 17-12-2016, 12:12 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 12:31 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by -JKP- - 17-12-2016, 02:44 PM
RE: [split] VMS - a forgery? - by bunny - 17-12-2016, 07:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)