2 hours ago
Thank you, this is largely what I suspected. The difference comes from the unusually strong IR signature of those glyphs. The question is - why does it exist? Simply because there is an abnormally high amount of ink that amplifies the weak IR signal of the ink to a point that it becomes relevant?
We see the 'x' in 'poxleber' and large parts of the following line also disappear because of the high IR signature in these parts. The issue with the 'p' descenders in the first line are known, but I don't quite understand the phenomenon. If you cycle through all wavelengths, they are present at none. If that's true, than their emergence would merely be a processing artifact as well.
We see the 'x' in 'poxleber' and large parts of the following line also disappear because of the high IR signature in these parts. The issue with the 'p' descenders in the first line are known, but I don't quite understand the phenomenon. If you cycle through all wavelengths, they are present at none. If that's true, than their emergence would merely be a processing artifact as well.