The evolution of P/F vs T/K raises important questions

[ololololo]

X should be CH

I haven’t heard of that.

The experts are not yet clear if ee should be u or ee or cc

You move from perceiving the text to reading it. This is already very subjective. 
I mean, in general, there are no ambiguities, and there’s nothing in the text that would make it contain cheody and echody, or cheedy and eechdy, or anything like that. Generally, the symbols in the text cannot be confused, and the reading is unambiguous.

And the thing is, it’s not clear how to read ee… ee is ee. I read it as two symbols e. I don’t know how to read it correctly. Next come the interpretations. Why u at all? Why not a? It was often written that way in Italy.