1 hour ago
(3 hours ago)tavie wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(4 hours ago)quimqu wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.yes, Claude style (and previously ChatGPT style) are common in the forum. My writting in presenting the results is Claude aided, as for me it is very difficult to write, make myself understandable, and make the results clear in a mix of technical and non technical ways. I think you can see in this thread: replies are my onw directly and posts about results are Claude aided.
To flag: Koen and I have previously urged users to avoid posting content drafted/rewritten by an LLM. We'd really rather have your unpolished text in your own words rather than Claude's words. Strict translation from another language, or getting tips on structure, is different. But when the LLM (re)writes, its style is highly distinctive and it risks people avoiding responding because they think they would be engaging with an LLM. Personally, I actually find the Claude style harder to read because I'm used to seeing the same style in all the 200+ slop threads we've had.
Ok, got it! I'll try...