The evolution of P/F vs T/K raises important questions

[npcompl33t]

First: I think P has enough data to do statistics on, especially if they are pooled to the bifolia and bifolia show similar patterns. I agree F does not have enough data analyze alone. 

Second: Wow you are right though about the ok/ot and k/t . 



I applied the same method as above, but instead of from P/F -> K/T , i did k/t->ok/ot


Something really interesting happens. the nature of the relationship between K/ok and the gradient actually inverts. Look at the angle chart on the bottom. In herbal 1a, oG and G are roughly equal, or uncorrelated with the gradient, and starting in Pharma the O variants to a consistent lead.

So at any given point from Pharma On, oG would would be 'different' from G in the way the same ways the overall gradient is moving. The changes must be hitting oG before G words.

   

Some interesting stuff here, but it might take me a bit of time to dig into it more and fully understand what is going on.

EDIT sorry i got my charts mixed up, this one maps k/t (excluding ok/ot) onto ok/ot , so comparing the relationship between the non O and O groups.