29-09-2026, 04:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-09-2026, 04:22 PM by Not_A_Corncob.)
(28-09-2026, 11:42 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(28-09-2026, 11:15 PM)Not_A_Corncob wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Notice how she is standing upright, holding a cross.
Below her is a woman lounging on her back, wearing some kind of head covering and some kind of wring, bracelet or shackle.
[..]
Is she really holding the (only) cross?
No. This gesture is more a refusing or putting away that cross.
For comparison: the next figure clearly holds a kind of ring - the draftsman was not unable to draw a hand in a holding position. He just didn‘t it for the first person and the cross.
So that may not be some message of Christianity, but right the opposite.
This is a really interesting thought.
Taken from that angle, it could represent someone's fall from grace. She rejects the cross, gives in to idleness and vanity, finds herself in a tight spot and ultimate gets down in the muck.
(29-09-2026, 05:48 AM)Linda wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Are your eyes uncrossed now, or did I make it worse?
I love the detail you put into your reply! I admittedly do not totally follow your logic here, but I love the idea of the tubes representing rivers. Are there other examples from the area and time period where this sort of symbolism is used?


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)