13-09-2026, 12:55 PM
I use AI assistance since writing a post in english is time consuming and exhausting to me. That said, the discussion about AI usage is missing the point.
I compare claims against the cited literature. I document contradictions between what is said on podcasts and what is written in papers. I did this in 2020 and I do it now. The responses were ad hominem then and they are ad hominem now. My posts were rejected in 2020 and I doubt that they would be welcome now if they were written differently.
If any of my points about the podcast is factually wrong, I would welcome a correction. That would be more useful than discussing how the English was formulated.
I compare claims against the cited literature. I document contradictions between what is said on podcasts and what is written in papers. I did this in 2020 and I do it now. The responses were ad hominem then and they are ad hominem now. My posts were rejected in 2020 and I doubt that they would be welcome now if they were written differently.
If any of my points about the podcast is factually wrong, I would welcome a correction. That would be more useful than discussing how the English was formulated.

