The Voynich Manuscript: Understanding the Untranslatable with Lisa Fagin Davis

[nablator]

These are not fringe positions — they represent the conclusions of the most experienced NSA researchers in the history of Voynich studies

I like the detailed criticism, harsh as it is, because it gives a historical background on solid research that should not be ignored or dismissed.

However, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, fringe or not, especially in a podcast, whether they disagree with some other famous researcher's opinion or not, I don't see that as an issue. Demanding that every opinion agrees with previous research is unreasonable.

The distasteful AI prose is lazy and should be avoided. Translation by AI chatbots/Google translate/DeepL is not an issue: it does not produce any detectable AI pattern. So unless you have abdicated your humanity and decided to act as a robot for the rest of your days (I hope not) you should just get your own prose translated to sound human and write in perfect English.

Note: no AI token was consumed by this post: 100% of it is in my own words, not even translated. Sure, my English could be improved by AI, but it would not be my text anymore.