The Voynich Manuscript’s positional entropy collapse

[Koen G]

I was busy with other obligations and made the mistake of not following this thread. 

So if I understand it correctly:

1) Torsten has a direct style that many find unpleasant. His posts also read like they are AI-assisted, which, true or not, makes them difficult to read. 
2) The paper under discussion has big issues with citations, similar to what happens when AI is misused for research.
3) The people that approved of the publication saw nothing wrong with this.
4) Torsten did the work they should have done, resulting in unpleasant ad hominem comments from the author.

While I would, on a personal level, find Torsten's posts easier to read if he used a different style, the more pressing issue seems to be that a paper with potential fake citations passed peer review. Tavi and Nablator seem to confirm this?