28-08-2026, 11:14 AM
(28-08-2026, 11:06 AM)MarcoP wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This is pure speculation. Since we have hard data, I think sticking to them is the best possible approach. More carbon testing could potentially find that there are pages that are more than 60,000 years old, therefore time-travel or alien technology is involved.
Yes, that point is pure speculation.
But why are you characterising what i've said in that way? I haven't claimed once that the results for the samples are incorrect. How is saying "we might find more samples like one of the samples we used" in any way similar to potential time travel and alien influence?
Technically, the combining of the samples makes more assumptions about the rest of the manuscript folios than what I am saying. I am explicitly saying we should stick to the hard data instead of interpreting it in the way it has been interpreted.